White house lit up gay flag colors
As a regime, it treats dissent as illegitimate. The rainbow flag represents the regime that our globalized elites intend to sustain. Hollywood, Silicon Valley, and Wall Street-drivers of globalization and the breaking of boundaries-wave the pride flag.
WHITE HOUSE LIT UP GAY FLAG COLORS WINDOWS
It flutters over our universities and is featured in the windows of global corporations. So it’s not surprising that our elites have embraced the rainbow flag. Gay life also realizes the dreams of many feminists-professional success and self-realization without the burdens of fertility. They pioneered the now upper-middle-class norm of extended adolescence, the carefree single life that extends for decades. Homosexuals, especially gay men, are also associated with scrupulous self-care and glamorous consumption. Drag queens blur boundaries-a marvelous evocation of the globalist dream of a world without borders. Men kissing men break down barriers-a wonderful image of our elites aspiring to remove obstacles to trade and commerce. Gay rights fit perfectly with the open-society goals of our elites.
Although the rainbow was originally meant to evoke Jesse Jackson’s ideal of a “rainbow coalition” of excluded groups, the flag is more often than not called the “pride flag.” It signals liberation for gays, the first among equals in the rainbow coalition. As Darel Paul documents in From Tolerance to Equality, gay rights became the focal point for the diversity agenda promoted by American elites, which is why its symbol is the rainbow flag. “There are no symbolic representations right now for the things the world really needs-equality and justice and humanity and solidarity and intelligence.” She wished for a strong symbol of “social justice, women’s rights, democracy, civil liberties and secularism.” Why couldn’t feminists, gay rights activists, and proponents of a more inclusive, affirming society have a flag? After 9/11, Katha Pollitt wrote a piece for The Nation that bemoaned all the American flags that were suddenly everywhere. The rainbow flag was inevitable, perhaps. When gay marriage was deemed a constitutional right, he lit up the White House with rainbow colors, confident that he was affirming “America” rather than asserting a partisan position. He countered his adversaries by stating, “That’s not who we are,” which meant that his critics were beyond the pale. Rather, they were “American values.” President Obama perfected the art of equating his political agenda with the regime. It asserted that diversity and inclusion were not terms of one political party. Over time, this consensus came to define our regime. Bush summed up this consensus when he praised “open borders, open trade, and, most important of all, open minds.” Speaking after the end of the Cold War, President George H. In Return of the Strong Gods, I argue that after 1945 a powerful consensus took hold, one that prized the virtues of the open society. In this domain we have undergone regime change. It also concerns what counts as a legitimate opinion in public life, and what is beyond the pale. But our regime is always more than constitutional provisions. And all of this is supposed to operate under the limits imposed by our rule of law. Politicians exploit procedures to angle for advantage. We litigate, organize, and in some cases protest. A regime defines essential matters about which “we all agree.” This agreement establishes the boundaries of legitimate political contestation, and it treats as traitors, rebels, and revolutionaries those who overstep and transgress.Īmerica’s regime has long been that of a constitutional republic. It refers to the source of political authority.
“Regime” is a technical term in political philosophy. It is the flag of our globalist elites, symbolizing “diversity and inclusion,” principles that they regard as the source of their right to rule.
The rainbow flag has taken on special significance in our regime.